Since in the last post we discussed methods of combating a logismos, we would like to speak for a minute, as it were, about the relation between method and Grace in the Orthodox Hesychast tradition.
We are not yogis.
Since in the last post we discussed methods of combating a logismos, we would like to speak for a minute, as it were, about the relation between method and Grace in the Orthodox Hesychast tradition.
We are not yogis.
The logismos is a bad thing. We don’t want to have logismoi. What can we do about them? Evagrius does not talk about the Jesus Prayer, so the answer he gives does not depend on its practice. However, in the Conferences 9 and 10, St John Cassian, the disciple of Evagrius, discusses a method very similar to the Jesus Prayer: the repetitive recitation of a short scriptural passage. This means that Evagrius must have known something about the role in the spiritual life of the repetitive recitation of a short passage. Moreover, we see in the Life and Rule of St Pachomios that repeating a short passage of Scripture was part of the Pachomian program, especially when the brothers were working or walking in a group.
The basic method to combat a logismos that Evagrius recommends is the ‘rebuttal’: this is the use of a passage of scripture to reject—to rebut—the demon that is exciting the passion and causing the logismos. However, Evagrius also recommends other methods, and St John of Sinai points out in the Ladder that rebuttal is beyond the strength of the beginner.
There is another method that Evagrius recommends in Peri Logismon 24. This is a very basic method based on the psychological fact that we cannot think two thoughts at the same time. If a demon is tempting us to think a logismos—a bad thought—then if we think about something else we will not be thinking about the logismos, and the demon will eventually get tired and go away.
For those of us who pray the Jesus Prayer, this is a very important method of combating a logismos: all we have to do is to take our mind off the logismos and return to the words of the Jesus Prayer.
There is a further concept in Evagrius’ approach to the logismos. This is the concept of attention. We pay attention to our thoughts. This is the foundation of Hesychasm as it is taught in the School of Sinai, which we started to discuss with St John of Sinai. In other words, one of the main features of the practice of the Jesus Prayer is the attention we pay to our thoughts while praying the Jesus Prayer, so as to reject logismoi.
We should be doing this, if we are serious, and especially if we are monks, all day long. Of course, there are inevitably distractions and an attempt to reach this level of practice before we are ready can have adverse effects—so much so that we might end up in a mental hospital. You have to be ready for this. However, it is the basis of the practice of Hesychasm.
So there are really two parts to the practice of the Jesus Prayer: reciting the Prayer—orally, silently in the heart, whatever—and combating our logismoi. And the basic way to combat the logismos is rebuttal. However, for us beginners, it is better simply to return to the words of the Jesus Prayer.
Let’s get back to something serious. We have dawdled on writing more in this series on the history of monasticism for fear that our readers would find the series too heavy. But let us continue.
One of the most basic concepts in Evagrius, and in the Philokalia, is the logismos (plural: logismoi). You hear Greek monks, especially on Mt Athos, talking all the time about logismoi. This Greek word usually is translated ‘thought’, and that is a good translation, but the concept involved is really that of the ‘tempting thought’.
The ‘tempting thought’ or logismos happens to a person in the first, purgative, stage of the mystical journey that we described in previous posts. At this stage, the person still has passions. These passions are, we said, the person’s emotional tendencies to sin based on a pleasure of the senses.
What happens in Evagrius’ explanation of things is that a demon (a fallen mind) approaches the person—monk or layman—and excites one of his passions (not necessarily the passion of fornication, one of the eight that we have discussed). The result is that the person suddenly discovers an image in his mind related to the passion that the demon has excited.
This image is of a sensible object. It is connected to the passion that the demon has excited. Evagrius tells us that from the object we can tell the passion that has been aroused. If we have an image of money, that is not the passion of gluttony; it is the passion of avarice, and so on.
The person then entertains the image and begins to converse with it—in reality with the demon—until such a time as the demon persuades him that what he should do is put the image into practice: commit the sin suggested by the image. And this for any one of the eight passions.
If we have been completely purified, the demon does not find any passions to excite and we do not have such images of sensible objects and we can ascend to God in pure prayer. This is part of Evagrius’ teaching on the nature of prayer: the images of sensible objects that we have in our mind block our ascent to God. The only way we can get rid of these images is to get rid of our logismoi.
How is this done? This is what the purificatory stage is all about: purification from our passions so that we no longer have logismoi. To put it in a nutshell, to ascend to God we have to purify our emotional tendencies to sin so as to transform them into tendencies to virtue, with the grace of the Holy Spirit.
As we have pointed out, Evagrius has two main techniques for purifying the person of his emotional tendencies to sin based on a pleasure of the senses.
The first technique is temperance. This is moderation in food and drink. Evagrius teaches us that only in this way can we restrain our tendency to sexual pleasure. Conversely by eating much food and drinking much water, we stimulate our tendency to sexual pleasure.
The second technique is meekness. Sometimes this is given as Christian love or humility. That is, we must make an effort to be humble, meek or loving. If we consider our last post, On Ad Hominem Attacks, what we should have been doing is responding meekly to Miss McMillan’s provocation.
Why? Because the exercise of meekness, humility and love purifies the passions of the soul. These are the other six passions that we discussed in other posts—anger, avarice, sorrow, sloth, vainglory and pride. Conversely, indulging these passions, especially anger, increases them.
Evagrius remarks that a hermit who is full of anger is like a boat on the high seas with a demon for pilot: in his view, the main characteristic of the demons is their anger. This should give us food for reflection. Conversely, a person who has purified himself through temperance and humility has all of his emotions directed to virtue and is full of Christian love. He can then enter into the next stage of the mystical journey, the illuminative stage.
The Jesus Prayer is integrated into this model of the logismos. That is what Hesychasm is all about: it is an advanced way of proceeding on this journey towards complete purification of the emotions using the Jesus Prayer, so that the person no longer has logismoi.
Of course, we beginners must set a lower standard for our ascetical endeavours, including those of us who are married.
Miss Linda Diane McMillan of Austin Texas has sent us the following comment on our post ‘Reply to Maggie Ross’:
Rowan The Dog has left a new comment on your post "Orthodox Monasticism 9 — Reply to Maggie Ross":
I believe it is appropriate to refer to an Anglican solitary as Sister, not Miss. That is, unless of course you intend to infantilize and diminish the vitality of her presence. Then ‘Miss’ would be appropriate. Of course, only a very sad and flaccid little man would want to do that.
I am certain it was an inadvertent error.
Linda Diane McMillan
Austin
When we originally drafted the post, we automatically put ‘Miss’ without thinking about it. Much later, we realized that we hadn’t put ‘Sister’ and we thought about going back to the post and changing it. However, since it seems to us that ‘Maggie Ross’ is a lay name and not a name in religion—i.e. a name received in a formal service of tonsure—we had no way of knowing:
a. If Miss Ross had ever been formally tonsured. We are not aware of her saying so anywhere, but we obviously don’t know everything.
b. If Miss Ross’ name in religion is ‘Maggie’.
So we left the post ‘as is’. When we receive objective confirmation from Miss Ross, or even objective evidence Miss McMillan, that Miss Ross is a formally tonsured nun in the Anglican Church, or even another Church, and what her name in religion is, we will change the post. In the meantime, ‘Sister Maggie’ is ridiculous.
(Update, March 24, 2008. On her own blog, as accessed on March 24, 2008, while discussing a radio appearance, Miss Ross refers to herself as follows:
In one of the programmes, to be broadcast March 26 [2008], host John Lloyd (of "Spitting Image" fame), comedian Bill Bailey (the "curator" of the museum) and guests John Gribbin (cosmologist), comedian Alan Davies, and Maggie Ross (using her other name, Sr Martha Reeves) discuss whether their donations of The Big Bang, Epping Forest, and Silence should be included. [Emphasis added.]
Whence we conclude that Miss Ross’ name in religion is ‘Sister Martha Reeves’ and that she is indeed a tonsured nun in the Anglican Church—somewhere on the Internet it says, under the jurisdiction of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Moreover, it appears from the University of Tulsa website, as accessed on March 25, 2008, that Miss Ross is actually “Martha Reeves, a visiting professor of religion at The University of Tulsa” and that, moreover:
[Martha] Reeves is [the University of Tulsa’s] Distinguished Visiting Professor of Anglican and Ecumenical Studies. Reeves, writing under the name Maggie Ross, is known for her books on spiritual theology. She has lectured at Oxford University and has made presentations in parishes and monasteries on both sides of the Atlantic. A life-long ecumenist, she spends her summers fishing in Alaska.
Whence we conclude that ‘Maggie Ross’ is Sr Martha Reeves’ pen name. Under the circumstances, it doesn’t make sense to change our previous posts, or this one, to read ‘Sister Martha Reeves’ instead of ‘Miss Maggie Ross’.)
While it should be obvious from our post that we have serious reservations about Miss Ross’ stated views, anyone who has read through this blog knows that we make an effort at elementary Christian courtesy. If we have failed in that, we apologize. Anyone who detects anywhere in this blog a lack of Christian courtesy or an element of Christian courtesy that is hypocritical should let us know about where that is to be found, and we will consider whether we are on the right road. After all, Christian love, which extends even to enemies, includes an element of love that is expressed as courtesy. And we do take our vocation as a Christian quite seriously.
In this regard Miss McMillan might reconsider her insinuation that we are sad and flaccid little men who wish to infantilize and diminish the vitality of Miss Ross’ presence.
With best wishes,
—Orthodox Monk
Service for a Beginner Putting on the Rason
The priest says ‘Blessed’;[1] Thrice-Holy Hymn; All-Holy Trinity; Our Father; For yours is the Kingdom.
Troparia. Second Plagial Tone.
Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy on us, for deprived of every excuse we sinners offer this supplication to you as Master: have mercy on us.
Glory be to the Father...
Lord, have mercy on us for we have put our trust in you. Do not be exceedingly wrathful with us, neither remember our transgressions but as compassionate look upon us even now and redeem us from our enemies. For you are our God and we your people. We are all the work of your hands and we have invoked your name.
And Now...
Blessed One who gave birth to God, open to us the gate of compassion. May we who hope in you not fall short of our aim; through you may we be delivered from difficult circumstances. For you are the salvation of the Christian people.
Afterwards the present prayer:
Let us pray to the Lord.
We thank you, O Lord our God, who according to your great mercy has delivered your servant (so-and-so)[2] from the vain life of the world and called him to this religious profession. Make him worthy therefore to live worthily in this Angelic way of life. Guard him from the snares of the Devil and preserve his soul and body pure until death; and grant him to become your holy temple. Grant him understanding to hold you always in remembrance and give to him the humility of your commandments; and love, and meekness. Through the intercessions of our exceedingly holy Mistress who gave birth to God, the Ever-Virgin Mary, and all your saints. Amen.
Let us pray to the Lord.
Master, accept your servant (so-and-so)[3] to your salvific yoke and grant him to be enrolled in the flock of your elect. Clothe him with the robe of sanctification. Gird his loin with chastity. Show him to be a struggler for every temperance. Grant that the perfect gift of your spiritual charisms abide in him and in us. Through the intercessions of our exceedingly holy Mistress who gave birth to God, the Ever-Virgin Mary, and all your saints. Amen.
After this he tonsures him in the form of a cross, saying:
In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Saying three times the Amen.[4] And he clothes him with the Inner Rason and the Kalymauchion, saying nothing more.
And the Dismissal.
[1] The rubrics here are very concise. The priest puts on his priest’s stole and begins the service—which is ordinarily done separately from any other service—with ‘Blessed is our God...’, after which the reader continues with the standard beginning of a service, the first words of each part of this beginning being given in the rubric. Then the service continues with the following three troparia, all of which are in the second plagial tone.
[2] This would be the person’s baptismal name.
[3] This would be the person’s monastic name, which at this stage might even be the same as his baptismal name.
[4] That is, the priest would say ‘Amen’ after each person of the Trinity.
(Name Withheld) has left a new comment on your post "Rubrics and Service of the Great and Angelic Monas...":
Very interesting! I've been trying to find a copy of this on the internet for ages. Do you have a copy of the service for tonsuring a Rassophore? BTW I have only just discovered this blogger today - there is certainly a lot of material here. Are you a monk? At which monastery are you based?
Since the service is very short, we have posted it as the next post. Are we a monk? Not a very good one, but a monk. At which monastery are we based? At a monastery we haven’t told anyone about. Curiosity is normal; and, given the Essjay scandal, some scepticism. However, we do not plan to say anything that would give us away.
—Orthodox Monk